FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum Sintered 2014 ACT4-III

Precip hard

also MPIF 2014

ACT4-III = aCT4-2014 Type III

Highest-ductility heat-treated condition; use where impact or subsequent coining is required.

High cost $$$$

Values for the ACT4-III condition

Other Sintered 2014 tempers and conditions

Sintered 2014 is listed in 9 conditions; see the grade overview at Sintered 2014.

Compare all 9 conditionsHide
Condition · open for datasheetBest forYield MPaTensile MPaElong. %HardnessConductivity
ACT1-2014 Type I
Cheapest condition: as-sintered, lowest density — for lightly loaded brackets, covers and non-structural housings.75125545 HB33 % IACS
ACT1-2014 Type II
As-sintered at intermediate compaction pressure — best cost/strength balance when no heat treatment is wanted.90150650 HB35 % IACS
ACT1-2014 Type III
High-density as-sintered (double-press/repress or high compaction) for the best as-sintered ductility and toughness.100170755 HB37 % IACS
ACT4-2014 Type I
T4 on low-density parts: better strength than as-sintered while keeping some ductility for coining/staking.125180365 HB28 % IACS
ACT4-2014 Type II
Standard T4 condition — good compromise of strength and residual ductility for parts that are sized after heat treatment.1502153.570 HB30 % IACS
ACT4-IIIThis page
ACT4-2014 Type III
Highest-ductility heat-treated condition; use where impact or subsequent coining is required.170245475 HB32 % IACS
ACT6-2014 Type I
T6 on economy-density parts: maximum hardness per unit cost, but very little ductility.200220180 HB32 % IACS
ACT6-IIDefault
ACT6-2014 Type II
The workhorse condition for sintered 2014 structural parts: full T6 strength at standard compaction density.2502701.590 HB34 % IACS
ACT6-2014 Type III
Peak-strength sintered 2014: high-density (repressed/sinter-forged) parts approaching wrought 2014-T6 strength levels.3103302100 HB36 % IACS

What is Sintered 2014 ACT4-III?

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III is Sintered 2014 in the ACT4-III condition — highest-ductility heat-treated condition; use where impact or subsequent coining is required. Sintered 2014 ACT4-III has a yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) and a tensile strength of 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) — weaker than 56% of aluminum grades. Elongation at break is 4% and the elastic modulus is 68 GPa (9.86 Msi). Sintered 2014 ACT4-III has a density of 2.65 g/cm³ (0.0957 lb/in³), lighter than 90% of aluminum grades. It melts at 507°C (945 °F). ACT6-II is the default condition FabDigit quotes; ACT4-III is available on request or by drawing note.

Advantages

  • Easy to machine — 80/100, better than 92% of aluminum grades

Limitations

  • Hard to polish — 30/100, worse than 100% of aluminum grades
  • Difficult to weld — 22/100, worse than 83% of aluminum grades
  • Limited service temperature — 120°C (248 °F), worse than 79% of aluminum grades

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III properties

Typical room-temperature values for Sintered 2014 ACT4-III; 27 are specific to this condition. Other listed values are Sintered 2014 reference data and may not represent this condition. Bars are the position among aluminum grades.

Physical3

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III has a density of 2.65 g/cm³ (0.0957 lb/in³), lighter than 90% of aluminum grades. It melts at 507°C (945 °F).

Density2.65 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
Melting Point (Solidus)507°C945 °F
Liquidus Temperature638°C1,180 °F

Mechanical13

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III has a yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) and a tensile strength of 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) — weaker than 56% of aluminum grades. Elongation at break is 4% and the elastic modulus is 68 GPa (9.86 Msi).

Elastic (Young's) Modulus68 GPa9.9 Msi
Shear Modulus23 GPa3.3 Msi
Bulk Modulus58 GPa8.4 Msi
Poisson's Ratio0.33
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)245 MPa35.5 ksi
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)170 MPa24.7 ksi
Elongation at Break4%
Compressive Strength190 MPa27.6 ksi
Shear Strength165 MPa23.9 ksi
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)75 MPa10.9 ksi
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)8 J5.9 ft·lbf
Hardness, Brinell75 HB
Hardness, Rockwell B58 HRB

Thermal6

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III is rated for continuous service to 120°C (248 °F). It conducts heat at 135 W/m·K (78 BTU/hr·ft·°F), worse than 58% of aluminum grades. Thermal expansion is 22.5 µm/m·K (12.5 µin/in·°F).

Thermal Conductivity135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F
Specific Heat Capacity880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
Latent Heat of Fusion390 J/g168 BTU/lb
Max Service Temperature (continuous)120°C248 °F
Min Service Temperature-196°C-321 °F

Electrical3

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III conducts electricity at 32 % IACS, worse than 63% of aluminum grades.

Electrical Conductivity32 % IACS
Electrical Resistivity5.7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.24 µΩ·in
Magnetic Responsenon-magnetic

Chemical & Environmental3

Corrosion resistance is fair (44/100), worse than 65% of aluminum grades.

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)-0.66 V
Corrosion ResistanceFair44/100
Chemical Resistance SummaryGood in dry air and neutral organics; attacked by chlorides, strong acids and alkalis. Interconnected porosity traps electrolyte and plating/anodizing chemicals, so impregnation (resin or oil) is usual before wet finishing.

Sustainability4

Producing a kilogram of Sintered 2014 ACT4-III takes about 205 MJ of energy and emits 13.5 kg of CO₂ — more than 76% of aluminum grades. Typical recycled content is 10%.

Embodied Energy (primary production)205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
Embodied Carbon (primary production)13.5 kg CO₂/kg
Embodied Water1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
Typical Recycled Content10%

Manufacturability8

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III's machinability is very good (80/100, better than 92% of aluminum grades); weldability poor (22/100); formability poor (20/100).

MachinabilityVery good80/100
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)80%
WeldabilityPoor22/100
Formability (cold)Poor20/100
CastabilityPoor25/100
Brazeability / SolderabilityPoor25/100
PolishabilityPoor30/100
Anodizing Responsefair to good — best of the PM 2014 density classes

Values are nominal handbook figures for design screening. Confirm any required mill or lot documentation when quoting.

Working with Sintered 2014 ACT4-III

Is Sintered 2014 easy to machine?

Machines easily with sharp carbide/PCD tooling and light feeds, but interrupted cutting across pores dulls edges and smears; avoid coolants that soak into porosity unless the part is later impregnated.

Can Sintered 2014 be welded?

Essentially not weldable by fusion — trapped gas in pores blows the weld pool and the Al-Cu chemistry hot-cracks; join by adhesive, mechanical fastening or brazing on impregnated parts.

Can Sintered 2014 be formed, bent or molded?

Formed by uniaxial die compaction of lubricated premix, delubrication and sintering near 590–620 °C in dry N2; density is raised by repressing/sinter-forging, and coining or sizing is used to hit tolerances.

What surface finishes work on Sintered 2014?

Deburr by vibratory tumbling; resin- or oil-impregnate before plating, anodizing or painting to stop chemical bleed-out; chromate/phosphate conversion coatings and impregnation-plus-hard-anodize are typical for wear surfaces.

Sintered 2014 chemical composition (wt %)

Limits by weight percent from the governing specification, written the way the spec states them — a single maximum for impurities, a range for alloying elements, and the base element as balance. Nominal is the typical mid-range value.

ElementSpec limit (wt %)Nominal
Cumain strengthening addition, admixed or prealloyed3.8 – 54.4
Si0.5 – 1.20.8
Mg0.2 – 0.80.5
Feimpurity limit≤ 0.3—
Mnimpurity/optional≤ 0.4—
Other, each≤ 0.05—
lubricant (admixed wax/stearate)green-state only; burned off during delubrication/sintering1 – 1.751.5
Albalance—

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III — frequently asked

What is Sintered 2014 ACT4-III used for?

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III is typically used for automotive P/M brackets, small structural components, gears and bushings and cost-sensitive precision parts. In short: strongest common P/M aluminum; near-net shape, low machining; porosity limits ductility.

What is the yield strength of Sintered 2014 ACT4-III?

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) and a tensile strength of 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) — weaker than 56% of aluminum grades. Strength varies by condition: see the 9 listed tempers.

Is Sintered 2014 ACT4-III easy to machine?

Yes — machinability is rated very good (80/100, better than 92% of aluminum grades). Machines easily with sharp carbide/PCD tooling and light feeds, but interrupted cutting across pores dulls edges and smears; avoid coolants that soak into porosity unless the part is later impregnated.

Can Sintered 2014 ACT4-III be welded?

Not readily — weldability is rated poor (22/100). Essentially not weldable by fusion — trapped gas in pores blows the weld pool and the Al-Cu chemistry hot-cracks; join by adhesive, mechanical fastening or brazing on impregnated parts.

What surface finishes work on Sintered 2014 ACT4-III?

Deburr by vibratory tumbling; resin- or oil-impregnate before plating, anodizing or painting to stop chemical bleed-out; chromate/phosphate conversion coatings and impregnation-plus-hard-anodize are typical for wear surfaces.

Can Sintered 2014 ACT4-III be formed, bent or molded?

Formed by uniaxial die compaction of lubricated premix, delubrication and sintering near 590–620 °C in dry N2; density is raised by repressing/sinter-forging, and coining or sizing is used to hit tolerances.

What is the maximum service temperature of Sintered 2014 ACT4-III?

Sintered 2014 ACT4-III is rated for continuous use to about 120°C (248 °F). Strength falls off well before that limit — check the elevated-temperature data for load-bearing parts.

What is the difference between Sintered 2014 ACT6-II and Sintered 2014 ACT1-I?

ACT6-II is the default condition — the workhorse condition for sintered 2014 structural parts: full T6 strength at standard compaction density. ACT1-I: cheapest condition: as-sintered, lowest density — for lightly loaded brackets, covers and non-structural housings. Yield strength is 250 MPa in ACT6-II versus 75 MPa in ACT1-I.

Sources

  1. ASTM B595 — Sintered Aluminum Structural Parts — ASTM International (2020)
  2. MPIF Standard 35 — Materials Standards for PM Structural Parts (aluminium alloys) — Metal Powder Industries Federation (2021)
  3. ASM Handbook Vol. 7 — Powder Metallurgy — ASM International (2015)
  4. ASM Handbook Vol. 2 — Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys (2014 data) — ASM International (1990)
  5. Aluminum Association Teal Sheets — 2014 composition limits — The Aluminum Association (2018)

Property data is compiled from published supplier and standards handbooks and normalised for comparison. Nothing on this page is a certification — request mill certs, CoC or material test reports with your order.