FabDigitFabDigit

PCTFE vs PVDF

Polymer · grade comparison

PCTFE and PVDF are both polymer grades. PVDF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) for PCTFE, about 47% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 37 MPa (5.37 ksi). In exchange, PCTFE is the more ductile: elongation 110% versus 60% for PVDF. PVDF is lighter (1.78 g/cm³ vs 2.12 g/cm³ for PCTFE) and PVDF is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PVDF welds better (excellent vs poor) and PVDF sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PCTFE (specialty, $$$$$).

PCTFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PVDFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PCTFE vs PVDF: properties

PCTFEPVDF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

37 MPa5.4 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

110%
60%

Compressive Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Flexural Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

33 MPa4.8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
110 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Same in both: Hardness, Shore D 78 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.78 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

212°C414 °F
172°C342 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

50°C122 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.04%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
0.06%

Refractive Index

1.43
1.42

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

135°C275 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-240°C-400 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

126°C259 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

78°C172 °F
88°C190 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

150°C302 °F
145°C293 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

95%
44%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
165°C329 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
2×10¹² Ω·m7.87×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
0.17

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
2×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

92 / 100
96 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
2.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

290°C554 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
80°C176 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
10 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.7 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

385 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFEPVDF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCTFEPVDF
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PCTFE vs PVDF — frequently asked

Is PVDF stronger than PCTFE?

Yes. PVDF has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) for PCTFE — about 47% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 37 MPa (5.37 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PCTFE or PVDF?

PVDF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PCTFE is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PCTFE or PVDF?

PVDF, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 75/100 against 70/100 for PCTFE; for welding the order is PVDF first (excellent, 88/100) then PCTFE (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCTFE and PVDF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.