FabDigitFabDigit

ECTFE vs PCTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

ECTFE and PCTFE are both polymer grades. PCTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 31 MPa (4.5 ksi) for ECTFE, about 10% more. In exchange, ECTFE is the more ductile: elongation 250% versus 110% for PCTFE. ECTFE is lighter (1.68 g/cm³ vs 2.12 g/cm³ for PCTFE) and ECTFE is stiffer (1.7 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PCTFE machines more easily (very good vs good), ECTFE welds better (very good vs poor), and ECTFE sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PCTFE (specialty, $$$$$).

ECTFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PCTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

ECTFE vs PCTFE: properties

ECTFEPCTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
37 MPa5.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

31 MPa4.5 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

250%
110%

Compressive Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in
145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

93 HRR
112 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Shear Strength

—
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.68 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

240°C464 °F
212°C414 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

65°C149 °F
50°C122 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.447
1.43

Light Transmission

90%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
135°C275 °F

Min Service Temperature

-76°C-105 °F
-240°C-400 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

116°C241 °F
126°C259 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

77°C171 °F
78°C172 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

145°C293 °F
150°C302 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
95%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (short-term) 180°C356 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

80 kV/mm2,032 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
0.014

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.5 · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

96 / 100
95 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

280°C536 °F
290°C554 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
120°C248 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

283 kJ/m³
385 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFEECTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityECTFEPCTFE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

ECTFE vs PCTFE — frequently asked

Is PCTFE stronger than ECTFE?

Yes. PCTFE has a typical yield strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 31 MPa (4.5 ksi) for ECTFE — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ECTFE or PCTFE?

ECTFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PCTFE is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ECTFE or PCTFE?

PCTFE. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for ECTFE; for welding the order is ECTFE first (very good, 80/100) then PCTFE (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ECTFE and PCTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.