FabDigitFabDigit

PTFE vs PVDF

Polymer · grade comparison

PTFE and PVDF are both polymer grades, both corrosion resistant plastic. PVDF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE, about 4.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, PTFE is the more ductile: elongation 350% versus 60% for PVDF, and PVDF is harder (78 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). PVDF is lighter (1.78 g/cm³ vs 2.17 g/cm³ for PTFE) and PVDF is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 0.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PVDF welds better (excellent vs not recommended) and PTFE sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PVDF (high, $$$$).

PTFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PVDFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PTFE vs PVDF: properties

PTFEPVDF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.5 GPa0.07 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.18 GPa0.03 Msi
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.46
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

350%
60%

Compressive Strength

15 MPa2.2 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.7 GPa0.1 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Flexural Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.5 GPa0.07 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

15 MPa2.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

98 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

56 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

58 HRR
110 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Same in both: Izod Impact, Notched 160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.17 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.78 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

327°C621 °F
172°C342 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

126°C259 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.04%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
0.06%

Refractive Index

1.35
1.42

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

121°C250 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

55°C131 °F
88°C190 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

95%
44%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
165°C329 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
145°C293 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
2×10¹² Ω·m7.87×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.1
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

2×10⁻⁴
0.17

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
2×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

98 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
96 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

10 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

4%
2.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

375°C707 °F
230°C446 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
10 g/10 min

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
80°C176 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9.5 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

14 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

144 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePTFEPVDF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPTFEPVDF
Default conditionVirginUnfilled
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PTFE vs PVDF — frequently asked

Is PVDF stronger than PTFE?

Yes. PVDF has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE — about 4.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PTFE or PVDF?

PTFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PVDF is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PTFE or PVDF?

PTFE, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 75/100 for PVDF; for welding the order is PVDF first (excellent, 88/100) then PTFE (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PTFE and PVDF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.