FabDigitFabDigit

PCTFE vs PFA

Polymer · grade comparison

PCTFE and PFA are both polymer grades. PCTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 14 MPa (2.03 ksi) for PFA, about 143% more; tensile strength follows at 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, PFA is the more ductile: elongation 330% versus 110% for PCTFE, and PCTFE is harder (78 Shore D vs 60 Shore D). PCTFE is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 0.6 GPa) and PFA runs hotter in service (260°C vs 135°C continuous). On the shop floor, PCTFE machines more easily (very good vs good) and PFA welds better (very good vs poor).

PCTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PFAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PCTFE vs PFA: properties

PCTFEPFA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

37 MPa5.4 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
14 MPa2 ksi

Elongation at Break

110%
330%

Compressive Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
0.62 GPa0.09 Msi

Shear Strength

33 MPa4.8 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
60 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
50 HRR

Hardness, Shore A

—
97 Shore A

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

212°C414 °F
305°C581 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

50°C122 °F
90°C194 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.02%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
0.03%

Refractive Index

1.43
1.35

Light Transmission

—
92%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

135°C275 °F
260°C500 °F

Min Service Temperature

-240°C-400 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

126°C259 °F
74°C165 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

78°C172 °F
48°C118 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

150°C302 °F
95°C203 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
285°C545 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 95%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
2.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
2×10⁻⁴

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁷ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
100 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

92 / 100
99 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
4.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

290°C554 °F
370°C698 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
180°C356 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
5 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
14 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.7 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

385 kJ/m³
163 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFEPFA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCTFEPFA
Default conditionUnfilledHigh Purity (Semiconductor)
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PCTFE vs PFA — frequently asked

Is PCTFE stronger than PFA?

Yes. PCTFE has a typical yield strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 14 MPa (2.03 ksi) for PFA — about 143% more. Tensile strength is 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PCTFE or PFA?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PCTFE or PFA?

PCTFE. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for PFA; for welding the order is PFA first (very good, 78/100) then PCTFE (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCTFE and PFA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.