FabDigitFabDigit

ECTFE vs PVDF

Polymer · grade comparison

ECTFE and PVDF are both polymer grades. PVDF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 31 MPa (4.5 ksi) for ECTFE, about 61% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi). In exchange, ECTFE is the more ductile: elongation 250% versus 60% for PVDF. ECTFE is lighter (1.68 g/cm³ vs 1.78 g/cm³ for PVDF) and PVDF is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 1.7 GPa). On the shop floor, PVDF machines more easily (very good vs good).

ECTFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PVDFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

ECTFE vs PVDF: properties

ECTFEPVDF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

31 MPa4.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

250%
60%

Compressive Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

93 HRR
110 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.68 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.78 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

240°C464 °F
172°C342 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

65°C149 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.04%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.06%

Refractive Index

1.447
1.42

Light Transmission

90%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-76°C-105 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

116°C241 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

77°C171 °F
88°C190 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
44%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
165°C329 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Vicat Softening Point (B50) 145°C293 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
2×10¹² Ω·m7.87×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

80 kV/mm2,032 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
0.17

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
2×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

96 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
96 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
2.5%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

280°C536 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
80°C176 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

283 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVDFECTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityECTFEPVDF
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

ECTFE vs PVDF — frequently asked

Is PVDF stronger than ECTFE?

Yes. PVDF has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 31 MPa (4.5 ksi) for ECTFE — about 61% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ECTFE or PVDF?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ECTFE or PVDF?

PVDF. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for ECTFE; for welding the order is PVDF first (excellent, 88/100) then ECTFE (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ECTFE and PVDF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.