FabDigitFabDigit

FEP vs PCTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

FEP and PCTFE are both polymer grades. PCTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP, about 162% more; tensile strength follows at 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). In exchange, FEP is the more ductile: elongation 320% versus 110% for PCTFE, and PCTFE is harder (78 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). PCTFE is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 0.48 GPa) and FEP runs hotter in service (200°C vs 135°C continuous). On the shop floor, PCTFE machines more easily (very good vs good) and FEP welds better (very good vs poor).

FEPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PCTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

FEP vs PCTFE: properties

FEPPCTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.48 GPa0.07 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.18 GPa0.03 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

23 MPa3.3 ksi
37 MPa5.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

320%
110%

Compressive Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

2,700 J/m50.6 ft·lbf/in
145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

56 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

25 HRR
112 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Shear Strength

—
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

260°C500 °F
212°C414 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-90°C-130 °F
50°C122 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.344
1.43

Light Transmission

95%
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
135°C275 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-240°C-400 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
126°C259 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

51°C124 °F
78°C172 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

230°C446 °F
180°C356 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 95%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.1
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

6×10⁻⁴
0.014

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

98 / 100
95 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

4%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

7 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
290°C554 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
120°C248 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb
240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

11 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

176 kJ/m³
385 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFEPPCTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFEPPCTFE
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

FEP vs PCTFE — frequently asked

Is PCTFE stronger than FEP?

Yes. PCTFE has a typical yield strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP — about 162% more. Tensile strength is 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, FEP or PCTFE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, FEP or PCTFE?

PCTFE. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for FEP; for welding the order is FEP first (very good, 80/100) then PCTFE (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FEP and PCTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.