FabDigitFabDigit

FEP vs PVDF

Polymer · grade comparison

FEP and PVDF are both polymer grades, both corrosion resistant plastic. PVDF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP, about 3.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). In exchange, FEP is the more ductile: elongation 320% versus 60% for PVDF, and PVDF is harder (78 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). PVDF is lighter (1.78 g/cm³ vs 2.15 g/cm³ for FEP) and PVDF is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 0.48 GPa). On the shop floor, PVDF machines more easily (very good vs good) and PVDF sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than FEP (specialty, $$$$$).

FEPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PVDFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

FEP vs PVDF: properties

FEPPVDF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.48 GPa0.07 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.18 GPa0.03 Msi
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

23 MPa3.3 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

320%
60%

Compressive Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

2,700 J/m50.6 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

56 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

25 HRR
110 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.78 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

260°C500 °F
172°C342 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-90°C-130 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.04%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
0.06%

Refractive Index

1.344
1.42

Light Transmission

95%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

51°C124 °F
88°C190 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

95%
44%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

230°C446 °F
165°C329 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
145°C293 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
2×10¹² Ω·m7.87×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.1
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

6×10⁻⁴
0.17

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
2×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

98 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
96 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

4%
2.5%

Melt Flow Rate

7 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
80°C176 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

11 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

176 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFEPPVDF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFEPPVDF
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

FEP vs PVDF — frequently asked

Is PVDF stronger than FEP?

Yes. PVDF has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP — about 3.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, FEP or PVDF?

PVDF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while FEP is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, FEP or PVDF?

PVDF. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for FEP; for welding the order is PVDF first (excellent, 88/100) then FEP (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FEP and PVDF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.