FabDigitFabDigit

PCTFE vs PTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

PCTFE and PTFE are both polymer grades. PCTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE, about 183% more; tensile strength follows at 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, PTFE is the more ductile: elongation 350% versus 110% for PCTFE, and PCTFE is harder (78 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). PCTFE is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 0.5 GPa) and PTFE runs hotter in service (260°C vs 135°C continuous). On the shop floor, PTFE machines more easily (80 vs 70 out of 100), PCTFE welds better (poor vs not recommended), and PTFE sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PCTFE (specialty, $$$$$).

PCTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

PTFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PCTFE vs PTFE: properties

PCTFEPTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

37 MPa5.4 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

110%
350%

Compressive Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Flexural Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Shear Strength

33 MPa4.8 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
56 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
58 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.18 GPa0.03 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

—
98 Shore A

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.17 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

212°C414 °F
327°C621 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

50°C122 °F
126°C259 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.43
1.35

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

135°C275 °F
260°C500 °F

Min Service Temperature

-240°C-400 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

126°C259 °F
121°C250 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

78°C172 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

150°C302 °F
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 95%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
2.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
2×10⁻⁴

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁷ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
98 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

92 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
4%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

290°C554 °F
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
9.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
14 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.7 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

385 kJ/m³
144 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFEPTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCTFEPTFE
Default conditionUnfilledVirgin
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PCTFE vs PTFE — frequently asked

Is PCTFE stronger than PTFE?

Yes. PCTFE has a typical yield strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE — about 183% more. Tensile strength is 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PCTFE or PTFE?

PTFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PCTFE is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PCTFE or PTFE?

PTFE, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 70/100 for PCTFE; for welding the order is PCTFE first (poor, 20/100) then PTFE (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCTFE and PTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.