FabDigitFabDigit

PA6G vs PC-ABS

Polymer · grade comparison

PA6G and PC-ABS are both polymer grades, both engineering plastic. PA6G is the stronger of the two: yield strength 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for PC-ABS, about 42% more; tensile strength follows at 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 56 MPa (8.12 ksi). In exchange, PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 25% for PA6G. PA6G is stiffer (3.4 GPa vs 2.4 GPa) and PA6G conducts heat better (0.29 W/m·K vs 0.2 W/m·K). On the shop floor, PA6G machines more easily (very good vs good) and PC-ABS welds better (very good vs poor).

PA6GChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PC-ABSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PA6G vs PC-ABS: properties

PA6GPC-ABS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.4 GPa0.49 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.87 GPa0.13 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

82 MPa11.9 ksi
56 MPa8.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

78 MPa11.3 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
90%

Compressive Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.2 GPa0.46 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

110 MPa16 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in
500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

88 HRM
68 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
115 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Temperature (Tm)

220°C428 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

60°C140 °F
125°C257 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.3%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

6.5%
0.6%

Same in both: Density 1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

105°C221 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

180°C356 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
105°C221 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

210°C410 °F
135°C275 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

25%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

160°C320 °F
125°C257 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.6
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.025
0.008

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
250 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

30 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
265°C509 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
75°C167 °F

Mold Shrinkage

—
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

—
14 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

125 MJ/kg53,740 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

71 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

895 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-ABSPA6G

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA6GPC-ABS
Default conditionCast UnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PA6G vs PC-ABS — frequently asked

Is PA6G stronger than PC-ABS?

Yes. PA6G has a typical yield strength of 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for PC-ABS — about 42% more. Tensile strength is 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 56 MPa (8.12 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA6G or PC-ABS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PA6G or PC-ABS?

PA6G. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (65/100) for PC-ABS; for welding the order is PC-ABS first (very good, 72/100) then PA6G (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA6G and PC-ABS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.