FabDigitFabDigit

EPS vs PC-ABS

Polymer · grade comparison

EPS and PC-ABS are both polymer grades. PC-ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for EPS, about 275 times as much; tensile strength follows at 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi). PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 3% for EPS. EPS is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for PC-ABS) and PC-ABS is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, EPS machines more easily (excellent vs good), PC-ABS welds better (very good vs fair), and EPS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PC-ABS (standard, $$).

EPSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

PC-ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EPS vs PC-ABS: properties

EPSPC-ABS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.1
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.25 MPa0.04 ksi
56 MPa8.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

0.2 MPa0.03 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
90%

Compressive Strength

0.11 MPa0.02 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

0.26 MPa0.04 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0 GPa6.53×10⁻⁴ Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

0.11 MPa0.02 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Shear Modulus

—
0.87 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

—
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
68 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
115 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.02 g/cm³7.23×10⁻⁴ lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

100°C212 °F
125°C257 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.5%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

4%
0.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,350 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

96°C205 °F
135°C275 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
125°C257 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
105°C221 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.03
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
0.008

Dielectric Strength

—
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
250 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

15 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.6%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

110°C230 °F
75°C167 °F

Polishability

—
65 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

—
14 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
265°C509 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

13 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

4 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

1.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-ABSEPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEPSPC-ABS
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

EPS vs PC-ABS — frequently asked

Is PC-ABS stronger than EPS?

Yes. PC-ABS has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for EPS — about 275 times as much. Tensile strength is 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EPS or PC-ABS?

EPS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PC-ABS is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EPS or PC-ABS?

EPS. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against good (65/100) for PC-ABS; for welding the order is PC-ABS first (very good, 72/100) then EPS (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EPS and PC-ABS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.