FabDigitFabDigit

ASA vs PC-ABS

Polymer · grade comparison

ASA and PC-ABS are both polymer grades. PC-ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for ASA, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi). PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 25% for ASA. ASA is lighter (1.07 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for PC-ABS) and PC-ABS is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, ASA machines more easily (very good vs good).

ASAChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

PC-ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ASA vs PC-ABS: properties

ASAPC-ABS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.8 GPa0.12 Msi
0.87 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

47 MPa6.8 ksi
56 MPa8.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
90%

Compressive Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in
500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

70 HRM
68 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
115 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.07 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
125°C257 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.6%

Refractive Index

1.57
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

98°C208 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

88°C190 °F
105°C221 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
135°C275 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
125°C257 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
0.008

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
250 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

88 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
14 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

245°C473 °F
265°C509 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

65°C149 °F
75°C167 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.9 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

44 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

460 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 2.1 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-ABSASA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityASAPC-ABS
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. They share 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

ASA vs PC-ABS — frequently asked

Is PC-ABS stronger than ASA?

Yes. PC-ABS has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for ASA — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ASA or PC-ABS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ASA or PC-ABS?

ASA. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (65/100) for PC-ABS.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ASA and PC-ABS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.