FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs PC-ABS

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and PC-ABS are both polymer grades. PC-ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS, about 31% more; tensile strength follows at 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi). PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 25% for ABS. ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for PC-ABS) and PC-ABS runs hotter in service (100°C vs 75°C continuous). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good) and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PC-ABS (standard, $$).

ABSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

PC-ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ABS vs PC-ABS: properties

ABSPC-ABS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.87 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
4 GPa0.52 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
56 MPa8.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
90%

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
115 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
68 HRM

Same in both: Compressive Strength 65 MPa9.4 ksi · Flexural Modulus 2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
125°C257 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
105°C221 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
135°C275 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
125°C257 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.008

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
250 V

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
14 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
265°C509 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
75°C167 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSPC-ABS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSPC-ABS
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. They share 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

ABS vs PC-ABS — frequently asked

Is PC-ABS stronger than ABS?

Yes. PC-ABS has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS — about 31% more. Tensile strength is 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or PC-ABS?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PC-ABS is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or PC-ABS?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (65/100) for PC-ABS; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then PC-ABS (very good, 72/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and PC-ABS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.