FabDigitFabDigit

ASA vs EPS

Polymer · grade comparison

ASA and EPS are both polymer grades. ASA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for EPS, about 225 times as much; tensile strength follows at 47 MPa (6.82 ksi) vs 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi). ASA is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 3% for EPS. EPS is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 1.07 g/cm³ for ASA) and ASA is stiffer (2.2 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, EPS machines more easily (excellent vs very good), ASA welds better (very good vs fair), and EPS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ASA (standard, $$).

ASAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EPSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

ASA vs EPS: properties

ASAEPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Modulus

0.8 GPa0.12 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.1

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

47 MPa6.8 ksi
0.25 MPa0.04 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
0.2 MPa0.03 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
3%

Compressive Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
0.11 MPa0.02 ksi

Flexural Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
0.26 MPa0.04 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
0 GPa6.53×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
0.11 MPa0.02 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

70 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
—

Compressive Modulus

—
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.07 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.02 g/cm³7.23×10⁻⁴ lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
100°C212 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
4%

Refractive Index

1.57
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,350 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
75°C167 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

98°C208 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

88°C190 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
96°C205 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
1.03

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
3×10⁻⁴

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

88 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
—

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

245°C473 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

65°C149 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 0.5%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.9 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

44 kN·m/kg
13 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.1 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

460 kJ/m³
4 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
1.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleASAEPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityASAEPS
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ASA vs EPS — frequently asked

Is ASA stronger than EPS?

Yes. ASA has a typical yield strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for EPS — about 225 times as much. Tensile strength is 47 MPa (6.82 ksi) vs 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ASA or EPS?

EPS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ASA is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ASA or EPS?

EPS. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (75/100) for ASA; for welding the order is ASA first (very good, 70/100) then EPS (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ASA and EPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.