FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium IMI 834-STA (Solution treated and aged)

Heat-treated state · default condition

Standard disc/forging condition: bimodal structure with ~15 % primary α giving the best balance of strength, LCF life and 600 °C creep.

High cost $$$$

Values for the STA condition

Other IMI 834 tempers and conditions

IMI 834 is listed in 3 conditions; see the grade overview at IMI 834.

Compare all 3 conditionsHide
Condition · open for datasheetBest forYield MPaTensile MPaElong. %HardnessConductivity
Annealed
Softest supply condition for bar, sheet and machining stock; use when parts will be re-solution treated and aged after forming or machining.8509601432 HRC—
Β-STA
Fully transformed (Widmanstätten/colony) structure for maximum creep resistance and crack-growth resistance in blades and thick sections; pay with lower ductility and LCF life.880990833 HRC—
STADefaultThis page
Solution treated and aged
Standard disc/forging condition: bimodal structure with ~15 % primary α giving the best balance of strength, LCF life and 600 °C creep.9101,0301234 HRC—

What is IMI 834-STA?

IMI 834-STA is IMI 834 heat treated to STA — standard disc/forging condition: bimodal structure with ~15 % primary α giving the best balance of strength, LCF life and 600 °C creep. IMI 834-STA has a yield strength of 910 MPa (132 ksi) and a tensile strength of 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) — stronger than 84% of titanium grades. Elongation at break is 12% and the elastic modulus is 120 GPa (17.4 Msi). IMI 834-STA has a density of 4.55 g/cm³ (0.164 lb/in³), heavier than 84% of titanium grades. It melts at 1,550°C (2,822 °F).

Advantages

  • High service temperature — 600°C (1,112 °F), better than 100% of titanium grades
  • Stiff — 120 GPa (17.4 Msi), better than 98% of titanium grades
  • High strength — 910 MPa (132 ksi), better than 84% of titanium grades

Limitations

  • Low fracture toughness — 50 MPa·√m (45.5 ksi·√in), worse than 96% of titanium grades
  • Difficult to weld — 40/100, worse than 94% of titanium grades
  • Limited formability — 15/100, worse than 93% of titanium grades
  • Low electrical conductivity — 1 % IACS, worse than 89% of titanium grades
  • Limited ductility — 12%, worse than 78% of titanium grades

IMI 834-STA properties

Typical room-temperature values for IMI 834-STA; 10 are specific to this condition. Other listed values are IMI 834 reference data and may not represent this condition. Bars are the position among titanium grades.

Physical3

IMI 834-STA has a density of 4.55 g/cm³ (0.164 lb/in³), heavier than 84% of titanium grades. It melts at 1,550°C (2,822 °F).

Density4.55 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
Melting Point (Solidus)1,550°C2,822 °F
Liquidus Temperature1,620°C2,948 °F

Mechanical16

IMI 834-STA has a yield strength of 910 MPa (132 ksi) and a tensile strength of 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) — stronger than 84% of titanium grades. Elongation at break is 12% and the elastic modulus is 120 GPa (17.4 Msi).

Elastic (Young's) Modulus120 GPa17.4 Msi
Shear Modulus45 GPa6.5 Msi
Bulk Modulus110 GPa16 Msi
Poisson's Ratio0.32
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)1,030 MPa149 ksi
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)910 MPa132 ksi
Elongation at Break12%
Reduction in Area25%
Compressive Strength960 MPa139 ksi
Shear Strength640 MPa92.8 ksi
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)600 MPa87 ksi
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)13 J9.6 ft·lbf
Hardness, Brinell320 HB
Hardness, Rockwell C34 HRC
Hardness, Vickers340 HV

Thermal6

IMI 834-STA is rated for continuous service to 600°C (1,112 °F). It conducts heat at 7 W/m·K (4.04 BTU/hr·ft·°F), worse than 76% of titanium grades. Thermal expansion is 9.7 µm/m·K (5.39 µin/in·°F).

Thermal Conductivity7 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
Specific Heat Capacity530 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)9.7 µm/m·K5.4 µin/in·°F
Latent Heat of Fusion325 J/g140 BTU/lb
Max Service Temperature (continuous)600°C1,112 °F
Min Service Temperature-100°C-148 °F

Electrical3

IMI 834-STA conducts electricity at 1 % IACS, worse than 89% of titanium grades.

Electrical Conductivity1 % IACS
Electrical Resistivity1.7×10⁻⁶ Ω·m66.9 µΩ·in
Magnetic Responsenon-magnetic

Chemical & Environmental3

Corrosion resistance is excellent (85/100), worse than 93% of titanium grades.

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)-0.1 V
Corrosion ResistanceExcellent85/100
Chemical Resistance SummaryPassive TiO₂ film gives excellent resistance to seawater, chlorides, oxidising acids and most jet fuels/lubricants; attacked by HF, hot concentrated HCl/H₂SO₄ and dry chlorine; above ~600 °C oxygen-rich alpha-case forms and hydrogen pickup embrittles.

Sustainability4

Producing a kilogram of IMI 834-STA takes about 700 MJ of energy and emits 45 kg of CO₂ — more than 74% of titanium grades. Typical recycled content is 10%.

Embodied Energy (primary production)700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb
Embodied Carbon (primary production)45 kg CO₂/kg
Embodied Water800 L/kg95.9 gal/lb
Typical Recycled Content10%

Manufacturability6

IMI 834-STA's machinability is poor (15/100, worse than 97% of titanium grades); weldability fair (40/100); formability poor (15/100).

MachinabilityPoor15/100
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)12%
WeldabilityFair40/100
Formability (cold)Poor15/100
PolishabilityVery good70/100
Anodizing Responsefair — chemical/anodic oxidation used for identification colour and galling control, not as a load-bearing coating; blue etch anodize used for crack inspection of forgings

Common Calculations5

Specific Strength (UTS / density)calculated226 kN·m/kg
Specific Stiffness (E / density)calculated26.4 MN·m/kg
Modulus of Resiliencecalculated3,450 kJ/m³
Thermal Diffusivitycalculated2.9 mm²/s
Thermal Shock Resistance Indexcalculated6

Values are nominal handbook figures for design screening. Confirm any required mill or lot documentation when quoting.

Working with IMI 834-STA

Is IMI 834 easy to machine?

Very difficult: low thermal conductivity plus silicides cause rapid tool wear — use rigid setups, sharp uncoated carbide, 20–40 m/min, heavy flood coolant and positive feed to avoid work hardening and smearing.

Can IMI 834 be welded?

GTAW/plasma/electron-beam weldable with full inert shielding or vacuum, but weld and HAZ lose ductility; a 600–700 °C post-weld stress relief is mandatory and welds are generally avoided in rotating disc hardware.

Can IMI 834 be formed, bent or molded?

Hot work only — isothermal/near-isothermal forging in the α+β field (~950–1010 °C) with tight temperature control, since primary α content and hence creep life depend directly on the final solution temperature.

What surface finishes work on IMI 834?

Grind/chem-mill to remove alpha case after hot work; shot peening is standard for LCF life, and blue-etch anodize plus FPI are used for crack detection; no protective anodic coating is expected.

IMI 834 chemical composition (wt %)

Limits by weight percent from the governing specification, written the way the spec states them — a single maximum for impurities, a range for alloying elements, and the base element as balance. Nominal is the typical mid-range value.

ElementSpec limit (wt %)Nominal
Alα stabiliser, main strengthener5.5 – 6.15.8
Sn3.5 – 4.54
Zr3 – 43.5
Nboxidation resistance0.5 – 0.90.7
Moβ stabiliser0.25 – 0.750.5
Sicreep resistance via silicide precipitation0.2 – 0.60.35
Cwidens the heat-treatment window (primary α control)0.04 – 0.080.06
O≤ 0.150.1
Fe≤ 0.05—
N≤ 0.03—
H≤ 0.01—
Tibalance—

IMI 834-STA — frequently asked

What is IMI 834-STA used for?

IMI 834-STA is typically used for jet engine turbine discs, compressor discs, HP compressor drums and spools, blade and blisk forgings, engine rings and spacers and hot-section shafts. In short: highest-temperature near-alpha disc alloy; creep resistance to 600 °C; hardest near-alpha to machine.

What is the yield strength of IMI 834-STA?

IMI 834-STA has a typical yield strength of 910 MPa (132 ksi) and a tensile strength of 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) — stronger than 84% of titanium grades. Strength varies by condition: see the 3 listed tempers.

Is IMI 834-STA easy to machine?

Not especially — machinability is rated poor (15/100, worse than 97% of titanium grades). Very difficult: low thermal conductivity plus silicides cause rapid tool wear — use rigid setups, sharp uncoated carbide, 20–40 m/min, heavy flood coolant and positive feed to avoid work hardening and smearing.

Can IMI 834-STA be welded?

With care — weldability is rated fair (40/100). GTAW/plasma/electron-beam weldable with full inert shielding or vacuum, but weld and HAZ lose ductility; a 600–700 °C post-weld stress relief is mandatory and welds are generally avoided in rotating disc hardware.

What surface finishes work on IMI 834-STA?

Grind/chem-mill to remove alpha case after hot work; shot peening is standard for LCF life, and blue-etch anodize plus FPI are used for crack detection; no protective anodic coating is expected.

Can IMI 834-STA be formed, bent or molded?

Hot work only — isothermal/near-isothermal forging in the α+β field (~950–1010 °C) with tight temperature control, since primary α content and hence creep life depend directly on the final solution temperature.

What is the maximum service temperature of IMI 834-STA?

IMI 834-STA is rated for continuous use to about 600°C (1,112 °F). Strength falls off well before that limit — check the elevated-temperature data for load-bearing parts.

What is the difference between IMI 834-STA and IMI 834-ANN?

STA is the default condition — standard disc/forging condition: bimodal structure with ~15 % primary α giving the best balance of strength, LCF life and 600 °C creep. ANN: softest supply condition for bar, sheet and machining stock; use when parts will be re-solution treated and aged after forming or machining. Yield strength is 910 MPa in STA versus 850 MPa in ANN.

Sources

  1. TIMETAL 834 high-temperature near-alpha titanium alloy data sheet — Titanium Metals Corporation (TIMET) (2000)
  2. ASM Handbook Vol. 2 — Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials — ASM International (1990)
  3. Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys — ASM International (1994)
  4. ASM Handbook Vol. 13B — Corrosion: Materials — ASM International (2005)
  5. CES EduPack titanium alloy eco-property records — Ansys Granta (2023)

Property data is compiled from published supplier and standards handbooks and normalised for comparison. Nothing on this page is a certification — request mill certs, CoC or material test reports with your order.