FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A532 Class III Type A vs A536 65-45-12

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A532 Class III Type A and A536 65-45-12 are both steel grades. A532 Class III Type A is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) for A536 65-45-12, about 15% more. In exchange, A536 65-45-12 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 0% for A532 Class III Type A, and A532 Class III Type A is harder (680 HB vs 170 HB). A536 65-45-12 is lighter (7.1 g/cm³ vs 7.65 g/cm³ for A532 Class III Type A) and A532 Class III Type A is stiffer (210 GPa vs 169 GPa). On the shop floor, A536 65-45-12 machines more easily (good vs not recommended) and A536 65-45-12 welds better (fair vs not recommended).

A532 Class III Type AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

A536 65-45-12Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

A532 Class III Type A vs A536 65-45-12: properties

A532 Class III Type AA536 65-45-12

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
169 GPa24.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
134 GPa19.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

0%
14%

Compressive Strength

2,100 MPa305 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

680 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

64 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

800 HV
180 HV

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Reduction in Area

—
12%

Shear Strength

—
405 MPa58.7 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
87 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.28

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.1 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,230°C2,246 °F
1,150°C2,102 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,180°C2,156 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Electrical Conductivity

—
2.9 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.45 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

2 / 100
68 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

5%
70%

Weldability

8 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

2 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

65 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb
21 MJ/kg9,028 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
1.7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

65%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

72 kN·m/kg
68 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.5 MN·m/kg
23.8 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

5.2 mm²/s
10.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA536 65-45-12

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA532 Class III Type AA536 65-45-12
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A532 Class III Type A vs A536 65-45-12 — frequently asked

Is A532 Class III Type A stronger than A536 65-45-12?

Yes. A532 Class III Type A has a typical tensile strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) for A536 65-45-12 — about 15% more.

Which is cheaper, A532 Class III Type A or A536 65-45-12?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A532 Class III Type A or A536 65-45-12?

A536 65-45-12. Its machinability rates good (68/100) against not recommended (2/100) for A532 Class III Type A; for welding the order is A536 65-45-12 first (fair, 35/100) then A532 Class III Type A (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A532 Class III Type A and A536 65-45-12 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.