FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A532 Class III Type A vs G3500

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A532 Class III Type A and G3500 are both steel grades. A532 Class III Type A is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for G3500, about 120% more. In exchange, G3500 is the more ductile: elongation 0.5% versus 0% for A532 Class III Type A, and A532 Class III Type A is harder (680 HB vs 225 HB). G3500 is lighter (7.2 g/cm³ vs 7.65 g/cm³ for A532 Class III Type A) and A532 Class III Type A is stiffer (210 GPa vs 110 GPa). On the shop floor, G3500 machines more easily (very good vs not recommended), G3500 welds better (poor vs not recommended), and G3500 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A532 Class III Type A (standard, $$).

A532 Class III Type AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

G3500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

A532 Class III Type A vs G3500: properties

A532 Class III Type AG3500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.26

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

0%
0.5%

Compressive Strength

2,100 MPa305 ksi
855 MPa124 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
6 J4.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

680 HB
225 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

64 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

800 HV
—

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Shear Strength

—
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
98 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.2 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,230°C2,246 °F
1,150°C2,102 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,205°C2,201 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Electrical Conductivity

—
2.2 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.45 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

2 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

5%
65%

Weldability

8 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

2 / 100
3 / 100

Castability

65 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb
21 MJ/kg9,028 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

65%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

72 kN·m/kg
35 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.5 MN·m/kg
15.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

5.2 mm²/s
13.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleG3500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA532 Class III Type AG3500
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A532 Class III Type A vs G3500 — frequently asked

Is A532 Class III Type A stronger than G3500?

Yes. A532 Class III Type A has a typical tensile strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for G3500 — about 120% more.

Which is cheaper, A532 Class III Type A or G3500?

G3500 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A532 Class III Type A is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A532 Class III Type A or G3500?

G3500. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against not recommended (2/100) for A532 Class III Type A; for welding the order is G3500 first (poor, 25/100) then A532 Class III Type A (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A532 Class III Type A and G3500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.