FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A48 Class 40 vs A536 65-45-12

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A48 Class 40 and A536 65-45-12 are both steel grades. A536 65-45-12 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) for A48 Class 40, about 51% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 293 MPa (42.5 ksi). A536 65-45-12 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 0.6% for A48 Class 40, and A48 Class 40 is harder (235 HB vs 170 HB). A536 65-45-12 is stiffer (169 GPa vs 125 GPa) and A48 Class 40 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, A536 65-45-12 welds better (fair vs poor) and A48 Class 40 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A536 65-45-12 (standard, $$).

A48 Class 40Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A536 65-45-12Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A48 Class 40 vs A536 65-45-12: properties

A48 Class 40A536 65-45-12

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
169 GPa24.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

50 GPa7.3 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

87 GPa12.6 Msi
134 GPa19.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.26
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

293 MPa42.5 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

225 MPa32.6 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.6%
14%

Compressive Strength

965 MPa140 ksi
—

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
405 MPa58.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

128 MPa18.6 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

235 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

99 HRB
87 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
12%

Hardness, Vickers

—
180 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.15 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³
7.1 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,240°C2,264 °F
1,180°C2,156 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,150°C2,102 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.2 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

20 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
68 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
70%

Weldability

20 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

3 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

18 MJ/kg7,739 BTU/lb
21 MJ/kg9,028 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

50 L/kg6 gal/lb
30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

90%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.7 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
68 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17.5 MN·m/kg
23.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

203 kJ/m³
342 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

14 mm²/s
10.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA536 65-45-12A48 Class 40

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA48 Class 40A536 65-45-12
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A48 Class 40 vs A536 65-45-12 — frequently asked

Is A536 65-45-12 stronger than A48 Class 40?

Yes. A536 65-45-12 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) for A48 Class 40 — about 51% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 293 MPa (42.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A48 Class 40 or A536 65-45-12?

A48 Class 40 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A536 65-45-12 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, A48 Class 40 or A536 65-45-12?

A536 65-45-12. Its weldability rates fair (35/100) against poor (20/100) for A48 Class 40.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A48 Class 40 and A536 65-45-12 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.