FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A436 Type 1 vs A532 Class III Type A

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A436 Type 1 and A532 Class III Type A are both steel grades. A532 Class III Type A is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for A436 Type 1, about 189% more. In exchange, A436 Type 1 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 0% for A532 Class III Type A, and A532 Class III Type A is harder (680 HB vs 150 HB). A436 Type 1 is lighter (7.3 g/cm³ vs 7.65 g/cm³ for A532 Class III Type A) and A532 Class III Type A is stiffer (210 GPa vs 100 GPa). On the shop floor, A436 Type 1 machines more easily (fair vs not recommended), A436 Type 1 welds better (poor vs not recommended), and A532 Class III Type A sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than A436 Type 1 (premium, $$$).

A436 Type 1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

A532 Class III Type AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A436 Type 1 vs A532 Class III Type A: properties

A436 Type 1A532 Class III Type A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
82 GPa11.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.26
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

2%
0%

Compressive Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
2,100 MPa305 ksi

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
680 HB

Bulk Modulus

—
155 GPa22.5 Msi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
64 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
800 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.3 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³
7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,150°C2,102 °F
1,230°C2,246 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,230°C2,246 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

39 W/m·K22.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.7 µm/m·K10.4 µin/in·°F
12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

760°C1,400 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
—

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in
9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.42 V
-0.45 V

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

52 / 100
2 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
5%

Weldability

30 / 100
8 / 100

Formability (cold)

3 / 100
2 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
65%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.7 MN·m/kg
27.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

11.6 mm²/s
5.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA436 Type 1

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA436 Type 1A532 Class III Type A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A436 Type 1 vs A532 Class III Type A — frequently asked

Is A532 Class III Type A stronger than A436 Type 1?

Yes. A532 Class III Type A has a typical tensile strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for A436 Type 1 — about 189% more.

Which is cheaper, A436 Type 1 or A532 Class III Type A?

A532 Class III Type A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while A436 Type 1 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A436 Type 1 or A532 Class III Type A?

A436 Type 1. Its machinability rates fair (52/100) against not recommended (2/100) for A532 Class III Type A; for welding the order is A436 Type 1 first (poor, 30/100) then A532 Class III Type A (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A436 Type 1 and A532 Class III Type A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.