FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A439 Type D-2 vs A532 Class III Type A

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A439 Type D-2 and A532 Class III Type A are both steel grades. A532 Class III Type A is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for A439 Type D-2, about 22% more. In exchange, A439 Type D-2 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 0% for A532 Class III Type A, and A532 Class III Type A is harder (680 HB vs 170 HB). A439 Type D-2 is lighter (7.4 g/cm³ vs 7.65 g/cm³ for A532 Class III Type A) and A532 Class III Type A is stiffer (210 GPa vs 120 GPa). On the shop floor, A439 Type D-2 machines more easily (fair vs not recommended), A439 Type D-2 welds better (fair vs not recommended), and A532 Class III Type A sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than A439 Type D-2 (high, $$$$).

A439 Type D-2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

A532 Class III Type AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A439 Type D-2 vs A532 Class III Type A: properties

A439 Type D-2A532 Class III Type A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
82 GPa11.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
155 GPa22.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

12%
0%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
2,100 MPa305 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in
25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

13 J9.6 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

170 HB
680 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
64 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
800 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.4 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,150°C2,102 °F
1,230°C2,246 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,230°C2,246 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

12.6 W/m·K7.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.7 µm/m·K10.4 µin/in·°F
12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

760°C1,400 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
—

Electrical Resistivity

1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in
9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.45 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
2 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
5%

Weldability

50 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
2 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
65%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

16.2 MN·m/kg
27.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

3.7 mm²/s
5.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA439 Type D-2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA439 Type D-2A532 Class III Type A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A439 Type D-2 vs A532 Class III Type A — frequently asked

Is A532 Class III Type A stronger than A439 Type D-2?

Yes. A532 Class III Type A has a typical tensile strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for A439 Type D-2 — about 22% more.

Which is cheaper, A439 Type D-2 or A532 Class III Type A?

A532 Class III Type A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while A439 Type D-2 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A439 Type D-2 or A532 Class III Type A?

A439 Type D-2. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against not recommended (2/100) for A532 Class III Type A; for welding the order is A439 Type D-2 first (fair, 50/100) then A532 Class III Type A (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A439 Type D-2 and A532 Class III Type A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.