FabDigitFabDigit

PVC Foam Board vs PVDC

Polymer · grade comparison

PVC Foam Board and PVDC are both polymer grades. PVDC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for PVC Foam Board, about 3.4 times as much. PVDC is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 12% for PVC Foam Board, and PVDC is harder (65 Shore D vs 50 Shore D). PVC Foam Board is lighter (0.5 g/cm³ vs 1.68 g/cm³ for PVDC) and PVC Foam Board is stiffer (0.75 GPa vs 0.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC Foam Board machines more easily (excellent vs poor), PVDC welds better (excellent vs good), and PVC Foam Board sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PVDC (premium, $$$).

PVC Foam BoardChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

PVDCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PVC Foam Board vs PVDC: properties

PVC Foam BoardPVDC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.75 GPa0.11 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

10 MPa1.5 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
80%

Compressive Strength

7 MPa1 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.5 GPa0.07 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

15 MPa2.2 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.65 GPa0.09 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Shear Strength

6 MPa0.87 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

50 Shore D
65 Shore D

Shear Modulus

—
0.18 GPa0.03 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
100 HRR

Tear Strength

—
12 kN/m68.5 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.5 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
1.68 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
-15°C5 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.1%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
165°C329 °F

Refractive Index

—
1.61

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.06 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.13 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
158 µm/m·K87.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
70°C158 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

32%
60%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

14 kV/mm356 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2
3.5

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.03

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

65 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
40 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

185°C365 °F
172°C342 °F

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.7 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

15%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.5 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 20 kN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVDC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPVC Foam BoardPVDC
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PVC Foam Board vs PVDC — frequently asked

Is PVDC stronger than PVC Foam Board?

Yes. PVDC has a typical tensile strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for PVC Foam Board — about 3.4 times as much.

Which is cheaper, PVC Foam Board or PVDC?

PVC Foam Board is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PVDC is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PVC Foam Board or PVDC?

PVC Foam Board. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against poor (30/100) for PVDC; for welding the order is PVDC first (excellent, 85/100) then PVC Foam Board (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PVC Foam Board and PVDC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.