FabDigitFabDigit

PVC-O vs PVDC

Polymer · grade comparison

PVC-O and PVDC are both polymer grades. PVC-O is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PVDC, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi). PVC-O is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 80% for PVDC, and PVC-O is harder (82 Shore D vs 65 Shore D). PVC-O is lighter (1.4 g/cm³ vs 1.68 g/cm³ for PVDC) and PVC-O is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 0.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC-O machines more easily (very good vs poor), PVDC welds better (excellent vs poor), and PVC-O sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PVDC (premium, $$$).

PVC-OChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PVDCChoose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

PVC-O vs PVDC: properties

PVC-OPVDC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

78 MPa11.3 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

90%
80%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
65 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
100 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.18 GPa0.03 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Tear Strength

—
12 kN/m68.5 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.68 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
-15°C5 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.2%
0.1%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
165°C329 °F

Refractive Index

—
1.61

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.13 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
158 µm/m·K87.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

45°C113 °F
75°C167 °F

Min Service Temperature

-10°C14 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

70°C158 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

82°C180 °F
70°C158 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

43%
60%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

60°C140 °F
100°C212 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
3.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
0.03

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

190°C374 °F
172°C342 °F

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.7 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

443 kJ/m³
324 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVDCPVC-O

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPVC-OPVDC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PVC-O vs PVDC — frequently asked

Is PVC-O stronger than PVDC?

Yes. PVC-O has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PVDC — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PVC-O or PVDC?

PVC-O is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PVDC is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PVC-O or PVDC?

PVC-O. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against poor (30/100) for PVDC; for welding the order is PVDC first (excellent, 85/100) then PVC-O (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PVC-O and PVDC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.