FabDigitFabDigit

PVC Foam Board vs PVC-O

Polymer · grade comparison

PVC Foam Board and PVC-O are both polymer grades. PVC-O is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for PVC Foam Board, about 7.8 times as much. PVC-O is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 12% for PVC Foam Board, and PVC-O is harder (82 Shore D vs 50 Shore D). PVC Foam Board is lighter (0.5 g/cm³ vs 1.4 g/cm³ for PVC-O) and PVC-O is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 0.75 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC Foam Board machines more easily (excellent vs very good), PVC Foam Board welds better (good vs poor), and PVC Foam Board sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PVC-O (standard, $$).

PVC Foam BoardChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

PVC-OChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PVC Foam Board vs PVC-O: properties

PVC Foam BoardPVC-O

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.75 GPa0.11 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

10 MPa1.5 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
90%

Compressive Strength

7 MPa1 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.5 GPa0.07 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

15 MPa2.2 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.65 GPa0.09 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Strength

6 MPa0.87 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in
400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

50 Shore D
82 Shore D

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
115 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.5 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.04%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.2%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 80°C176 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.06 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
45°C113 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
76°C169 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

32%
43%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

14 kV/mm356 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.015

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

65 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
45 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

185°C365 °F
190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb
65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.7 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

20 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.5 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC-O

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPVC Foam BoardPVC-O
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PVC Foam Board vs PVC-O — frequently asked

Is PVC-O stronger than PVC Foam Board?

Yes. PVC-O has a typical tensile strength of 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for PVC Foam Board — about 7.8 times as much.

Which is cheaper, PVC Foam Board or PVC-O?

PVC Foam Board is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PVC-O is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PVC Foam Board or PVC-O?

PVC Foam Board. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (70/100) for PVC-O; for welding the order is PVC Foam Board first (good, 55/100) then PVC-O (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PVC Foam Board and PVC-O side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.