FabDigitFabDigit

CPVC 4120 vs PVDC

Polymer · grade comparison

CPVC 4120 and PVDC are both polymer grades. CPVC 4120 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PVDC, about 189% more; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi). In exchange, PVDC is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 25% for CPVC 4120, and CPVC 4120 is harder (82 Shore D vs 65 Shore D). CPVC 4120 is lighter (1.53 g/cm³ vs 1.68 g/cm³ for PVDC) and CPVC 4120 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 0.5 GPa). On the shop floor, CPVC 4120 machines more easily (very good vs poor), PVDC welds better (excellent vs very good), and CPVC 4120 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PVDC (premium, $$$).

CPVC 4120Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PVDCChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

CPVC 4120 vs PVDC: properties

CPVC 4120PVDC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.18 GPa0.03 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.61 Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
80%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Shear Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
65 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
100 HRR

Tear Strength

—
12 kN/m68.5 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.53 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.68 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
-15°C5 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.15%
0.1%

Refractive Index

1.53
1.61

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
165°C329 °F

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.13 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
158 µm/m·K87.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

93°C199 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

104°C219 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

113°C235 °F
70°C158 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

105°C221 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 60%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.03

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
172°C342 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

50°C122 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.9 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

451 kJ/m³
324 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVDCCPVC 4120

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPVC 4120PVDC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CPVC 4120 vs PVDC — frequently asked

Is CPVC 4120 stronger than PVDC?

Yes. CPVC 4120 has a typical yield strength of 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PVDC — about 189% more. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CPVC 4120 or PVDC?

CPVC 4120 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PVDC is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CPVC 4120 or PVDC?

CPVC 4120. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against poor (30/100) for PVDC; for welding the order is PVDC first (excellent, 85/100) then CPVC 4120 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPVC 4120 and PVDC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.