FabDigitFabDigit

CPVC vs PVC Foam Board

Polymer · grade comparison

CPVC and PVC Foam Board are both polymer grades. CPVC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for PVC Foam Board, about 5.5 times as much. CPVC is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 12% for PVC Foam Board, and CPVC is harder (82 Shore D vs 50 Shore D). PVC Foam Board is lighter (0.5 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for CPVC) and CPVC is stiffer (3 GPa vs 0.75 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC Foam Board machines more easily (excellent vs very good), CPVC welds better (65 vs 55 out of 100), and PVC Foam Board sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than CPVC (standard, $$).

CPVCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PVC Foam BoardChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

CPVC vs PVC Foam Board: properties

CPVCPVC Foam Board

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

25%
12%

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
7 MPa1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
0.65 GPa0.09 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
6 MPa0.87 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
50 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
0.5 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.25%
0.6%

Refractive Index

1.55
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.06 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

93°C199 °F
60°C140 °F

Min Service Temperature

0°C32 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
62°C144 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

103°C217 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

115°C239 °F
76°C169 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

105°C221 °F
70°C158 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
14 kV/mm356 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
185°C365 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

55°C131 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
2.7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
1.5 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCPVC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPVCPVC Foam Board
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

CPVC vs PVC Foam Board — frequently asked

Is CPVC stronger than PVC Foam Board?

Yes. CPVC has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for PVC Foam Board — about 5.5 times as much.

Which is cheaper, CPVC or PVC Foam Board?

PVC Foam Board is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CPVC is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CPVC or PVC Foam Board?

PVC Foam Board. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (75/100) for CPVC; for welding the order is CPVC first (good, 65/100) then PVC Foam Board (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPVC and PVC Foam Board side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.