FabDigitFabDigit

FEP vs PTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

FEP and PTFE are both polymer grades, both corrosion resistant plastic. FEP is the stronger of the two: yield strength 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE, about 8% more. PTFE runs hotter in service (260°C vs 200°C continuous) and PTFE conducts heat better (0.25 W/m·K vs 0.2 W/m·K). On the shop floor, PTFE machines more easily (very good vs good), FEP welds better (very good vs not recommended), and PTFE sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than FEP (specialty, $$$$$).

FEPChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

PTFEChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

FEP vs PTFE: properties

FEPPTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.48 GPa0.07 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

23 MPa3.3 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

320%
350%

Compressive Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

2,700 J/m50.6 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

25 HRR
58 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Shear Strength

—
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

—
98 Shore A

Same in both: Shear Modulus 0.18 GPa0.03 Msi · Hardness, Shore D 56 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.17 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

260°C500 °F
327°C621 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-90°C-130 °F
126°C259 °F

Refractive Index

1.344
1.35

Light Transmission

95%
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
260°C500 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
121°C250 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

51°C124 °F
55°C131 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

230°C446 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 95%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

6×10⁻⁴
2×10⁻⁴

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁷ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.1 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
95 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 98 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
20 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

7 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
—

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 4%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
9.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

11 kN·m/kg
14 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

176 kJ/m³
144 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0.2 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFEPPTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFEPPTFE
Default conditionUnfilledVirgin
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

FEP vs PTFE — frequently asked

Is FEP stronger than PTFE?

Yes. FEP has a typical yield strength of 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 23 MPa (3.34 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, FEP or PTFE?

PTFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while FEP is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, FEP or PTFE?

PTFE. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (55/100) for FEP; for welding the order is FEP first (very good, 80/100) then PTFE (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FEP and PTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.