FabDigitFabDigit

ECTFE vs PTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

ECTFE and PTFE are both polymer grades. ECTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 31 MPa (4.5 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE, about 158% more; tensile strength follows at 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, PTFE is the more ductile: elongation 350% versus 250% for ECTFE, and ECTFE is harder (75 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). ECTFE is lighter (1.68 g/cm³ vs 2.17 g/cm³ for PTFE) and ECTFE is stiffer (1.7 GPa vs 0.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PTFE machines more easily (very good vs good), ECTFE welds better (very good vs not recommended), and PTFE sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ECTFE (high, $$$$).

ECTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PTFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ECTFE vs PTFE: properties

ECTFEPTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

31 MPa4.5 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

250%
350%

Compressive Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Flexural Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
56 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

93 HRR
58 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.18 GPa0.03 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Strength

—
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

—
98 Shore A

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.68 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
2.17 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

240°C464 °F
327°C621 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

65°C149 °F
126°C259 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.447
1.35

Light Transmission

90%
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
260°C500 °F

Min Service Temperature

-76°C-105 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

116°C241 °F
121°C250 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

77°C171 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

145°C293 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
95%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

80 kV/mm2,032 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
2.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
2×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁷ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

96 / 100
98 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
4%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

280°C536 °F
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
9.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
14 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

283 kJ/m³
144 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePTFEECTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityECTFEPTFE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Virgin
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

ECTFE vs PTFE — frequently asked

Is ECTFE stronger than PTFE?

Yes. ECTFE has a typical yield strength of 31 MPa (4.5 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE — about 158% more. Tensile strength is 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ECTFE or PTFE?

PTFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ECTFE is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ECTFE or PTFE?

PTFE. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (55/100) for ECTFE; for welding the order is ECTFE first (very good, 80/100) then PTFE (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ECTFE and PTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.