FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK vs PTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK and PTFE are both polymer grades. PEEK is the stronger of the two: yield strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE, about 8.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, PTFE is the more ductile: elongation 350% versus 30% for PEEK, and PEEK is harder (86 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). PEEK is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 2.17 g/cm³ for PTFE) and PEEK is stiffer (3.7 GPa vs 0.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PTFE machines more easily (80 vs 70 out of 100), PEEK welds better (fair vs not recommended), and PTFE sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PEEK (specialty, $$$$$).

PEEKChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PTFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

PEEK vs PTFE: properties

PEEKPTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.7 GPa0.54 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
0.18 GPa0.03 Msi

Bulk Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
350%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Flexural Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

75 J/m1.4 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
56 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

99 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

126 HRR
58 HRR

Hardness, Shore A

—
98 Shore A

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
2.17 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

343°C649 °F
327°C621 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

143°C289 °F
126°C259 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.01%

Refractive Index

—
1.35

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
260°C500 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

315°C599 °F
121°C250 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

152°C306 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

315°C599 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

35%
95%

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
2.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.003
2×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁷ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

150 V
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
98 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
4%

Melt Flow Rate

3 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

380°C716 °F
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

15 kg CO₂/kg
9.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

77 kN·m/kg
14 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.8 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,351 kJ/m³
144 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEKPTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEKPTFE
3D printingYes—
Default conditionVirginVirgin
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. They share 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PEEK vs PTFE — frequently asked

Is PEEK stronger than PTFE?

Yes. PEEK has a typical yield strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for PTFE — about 8.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEEK or PTFE?

PTFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PEEK is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK or PTFE?

PTFE, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 70/100 for PEEK; for welding the order is PEEK first (fair, 45/100) then PTFE (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK and PTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.