FabDigitFabDigit

PGA vs PLLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PGA and PLLA are both polymer grades. PGA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for PLLA, about 58% more; tensile strength follows at 110 MPa (16 ksi) vs 62 MPa (8.99 ksi). PGA is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 4% for PLLA. PLLA is lighter (1.26 g/cm³ vs 1.58 g/cm³ for PGA) and PGA is stiffer (7 GPa vs 3.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PLLA welds better (very good vs good).

PGAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PLLAChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

PGA vs PLLA: properties

PGAPLLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

7 GPa1 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
4%

Compressive Strength

120 MPa17.4 ksi
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

7 GPa1 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

95 HRM
—

Shear Modulus

—
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.59 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
85 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.58 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

222°C432 °F
175°C347 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

40°C104 °F
61°C142 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.8%
0.4%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
1%

Refractive Index

—
1.46

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

50°C122 °F
55°C131 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
20%

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F · Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa 55°C131 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.015

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
30°C86 °F

Polishability

—
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
1.3 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

4.4 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

645 kJ/m³
514 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePLLAPGA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPGAPLLA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PGA vs PLLA — frequently asked

Is PGA stronger than PLLA?

Yes. PGA has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for PLLA — about 58% more. Tensile strength is 110 MPa (16 ksi) vs 62 MPa (8.99 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PGA or PLLA?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PGA or PLLA?

PLLA, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for PGA; for welding the order is PLLA first (very good, 75/100) then PGA (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PGA and PLLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.