FabDigitFabDigit

PDLA vs PLLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLA and PLLA are both polymer grades. Both yield at about 58 MPa — strength does not separate them. PLLA is stiffer (3.5 GPa vs 3.3 GPa) and PLLA runs hotter in service (55°C vs 50°C continuous). On the shop floor, PLLA welds better (very good vs good), PLLA forms better (good vs fair), and PLLA sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PDLA (high, $$$$).

PLLAChoose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

PDLA vs PLLA: properties

PDLAPLLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.57 Msi
4 GPa0.59 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
85 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.36 · Elongation at Break 4% · Hardness, Shore D 83 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

178°C352 °F
175°C347 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

58°C136 °F
61°C142 °F

Refractive Index

1.455
1.46

Light Transmission

90%
88%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,590 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

50°C122 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
65°C149 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

53°C127 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

59°C138 °F
60°C140 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
80°C176 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 20%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.015

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

60 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
55 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
205°C401 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 0.4% · Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
1.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

510 kJ/m³
514 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePLLAPDLA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLAPLLA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLA vs PLLA — frequently asked

What is the difference between PDLA and PLLA?

PDLA and PLLA are both polymer grades. Both yield at about 58 MPa — strength does not separate them. PLLA is stiffer (3.5 GPa vs 3.3 GPa) and PLLA runs hotter in service (55°C vs 50°C continuous).

Which is cheaper, PDLA or PLLA?

PLLA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PDLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PDLA or PLLA?

PLLA. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (60/100) for PDLA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLA and PLLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.