FabDigitFabDigit

PBSA vs PLLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PBSA and PLLA are both polymer grades. PLLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PBSA, about 4.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). In exchange, PBSA is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 4% for PLLA, and PLLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 45 Shore D). PLLA is stiffer (3.5 GPa vs 0.22 GPa) and PBSA conducts heat better (0.2 W/m·K vs 0.16 W/m·K). On the shop floor, PLLA machines more easily (good vs poor), PBSA welds better (excellent vs very good), and PBSA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PLLA (premium, $$$).

PBSAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PLLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PBSA vs PLLA: properties

PBSAPLLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
4%

Flexural Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.24 GPa0.03 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

600 J/m11.2 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

93 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

45 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

70 HRR
85 HRR

Tear Strength

90 kN/m514 lbf/in
—

Shear Modulus

—
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.59 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.24 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

90°C194 °F
175°C347 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-43°C-45 °F
61°C142 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1%

Refractive Index

1.47
1.46

Light Transmission

85%
88%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,850 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

60°C140 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

68°C154 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
55°C131 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 55°C131 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.015

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.4%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
1.3 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

18 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

384 kJ/m³
514 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePLLAPBSA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBSAPLLA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PBSA vs PLLA — frequently asked

Is PLLA stronger than PBSA?

Yes. PLLA has a typical yield strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PBSA — about 4.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBSA or PLLA?

PBSA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PLLA is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PBSA or PLLA?

PLLA. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against poor (25/100) for PBSA; for welding the order is PBSA first (excellent, 88/100) then PLLA (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBSA and PLLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.