FabDigitFabDigit

PDLA vs PGA

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLA and PGA are both polymer grades. PGA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PDLA, about 64% more; tensile strength follows at 110 MPa (16 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi). PGA is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 4% for PDLA. PDLA is lighter (1.25 g/cm³ vs 1.58 g/cm³ for PGA) and PGA is stiffer (7 GPa vs 3.3 GPa). On the shop floor, PGA sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PDLA (high, $$$$).

PDLAChoose it when weight is the constraint.

PGAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PDLA vs PGA: properties

PDLAPGA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.57 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
12%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

83 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
95 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.58 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

178°C352 °F
222°C432 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

58°C136 °F
40°C104 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
0.8%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
2%

Refractive Index

1.455
—

Light Transmission

90%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,590 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

53°C127 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

59°C138 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 50°C122 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
—

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
—

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
35 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
—

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.8%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
235°C455 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Weldability 60 / 100 · Melt Flow Rate 15 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
4.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

510 kJ/m³
645 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLAPGA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLAPGA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLA vs PGA — frequently asked

Is PGA stronger than PDLA?

Yes. PGA has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PDLA — about 64% more. Tensile strength is 110 MPa (16 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLA or PGA?

PGA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PDLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PDLA or PGA?

PDLA, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for PGA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLA and PGA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.