FabDigitFabDigit

PHBV vs PLLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PHBV and PLLA are both polymer grades. PLLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for PHBV, about 140% more; tensile strength follows at 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) vs 27 MPa (3.92 ksi). In exchange, PHBV is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 4% for PLLA, and PLLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 75 Shore D). PLLA is stiffer (3.5 GPa vs 1.8 GPa) and PHBV runs hotter in service (95°C vs 55°C continuous). On the shop floor, PLLA welds better (very good vs good).

PHBVChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PLLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

PHBV vs PLLA: properties

PHBVPLLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.8 GPa0.26 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.65 GPa0.09 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

27 MPa3.9 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

25 MPa3.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
4%

Compressive Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
85 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.59 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

155°C311 °F
175°C347 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

2°C36 °F
61°C142 °F

Refractive Index

1.5
1.46

Light Transmission

—
88%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
55°C131 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

110°C230 °F
65°C149 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

140°C284 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

120°C248 °F
80°C176 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.01
0.015

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.4%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

55°C131 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
1.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

22 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.4 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

174 kJ/m³
514 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePLLAPHBV

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPHBVPLLA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PHBV vs PLLA — frequently asked

Is PLLA stronger than PHBV?

Yes. PLLA has a typical yield strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for PHBV — about 140% more. Tensile strength is 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) vs 27 MPa (3.92 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PHBV or PLLA?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PHBV or PLLA?

PLLA, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for PHBV; for welding the order is PLLA first (very good, 75/100) then PHBV (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PHBV and PLLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.