FabDigitFabDigit

PDLLA vs PGA

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLLA and PGA are both polymer grades. PGA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PDLLA, about 98% more; tensile strength follows at 110 MPa (16 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). PGA is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 5% for PDLLA. PDLLA is lighter (1.25 g/cm³ vs 1.58 g/cm³ for PGA) and PGA is stiffer (7 GPa vs 3 GPa). On the shop floor, PGA sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PDLLA (high, $$$$).

PDLLAChoose it when weight is the constraint.

PGAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PDLLA vs PGA: properties

PDLLAPGA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
12%

Compressive Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
95 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.58 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

55°C131 °F
40°C104 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.8%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
2%

Refractive Index

1.46
—

Light Transmission

90%
—

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
222°C432 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

45°C113 °F
50°C122 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

55°C131 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

57°C135 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

60°C140 °F
110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
—

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.013
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
—

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
15 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
235°C455 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

40 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.4 MN·m/kg
4.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

384 kJ/m³
645 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLLAPGA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLLAPGA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLLA vs PGA — frequently asked

Is PGA stronger than PDLLA?

Yes. PGA has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PDLLA — about 98% more. Tensile strength is 110 MPa (16 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLLA or PGA?

PGA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PDLLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PDLLA or PGA?

PDLLA, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for PGA; for welding the order is PGA first (good, 60/100) then PDLLA (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLLA and PGA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.