FabDigitFabDigit

PHBH vs PLLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PHBH and PLLA are both polymer grades. PLLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PHBH, about 3.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). In exchange, PHBH is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 4% for PLLA, and PLLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 58 Shore D). PHBH is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.26 g/cm³ for PLLA) and PLLA is stiffer (3.5 GPa vs 0.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PLLA machines more easily (good vs fair).

PHBHChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PLLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PHBH vs PLLA: properties

PHBHPLLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.8 GPa0.12 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

23 MPa3.3 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

18 MPa2.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

150%
4%

Flexural Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

58 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

90 HRR
85 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.59 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

140°C284 °F
175°C347 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

1°C34 °F
61°C142 °F

Refractive Index

—
1.46

Light Transmission

—
88%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

100°C212 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

95°C203 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
80°C176 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa 55°C131 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.015

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
0.4%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

50°C122 °F
30°C86 °F

Same in both: Melt Flow Rate 8 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
1.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

19 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.7 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

203 kJ/m³
514 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePLLAPHBH

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPHBHPLLA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PHBH vs PLLA — frequently asked

Is PLLA stronger than PHBH?

Yes. PLLA has a typical yield strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PHBH — about 3.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PHBH or PLLA?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PHBH or PLLA?

PLLA. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (45/100) for PHBH; for welding the order is PLLA first (very good, 75/100) then PHBH (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PHBH and PLLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.