FabDigitFabDigit

PDLLA vs PLLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLLA and PLLA are both polymer grades. PLLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PDLLA, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, PDLLA is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 4% for PLLA. PLLA is stiffer (3.5 GPa vs 3 GPa) and PLLA runs hotter in service (55°C vs 45°C continuous). On the shop floor, PLLA welds better (very good vs good) and PLLA sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PDLLA (high, $$$$).

PDLLAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PLLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PDLLA vs PLLA: properties

PDLLAPLLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
4%

Compressive Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Flexural Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
85 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.59 Msi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.36

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

55°C131 °F
61°C142 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.4%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1%

Light Transmission

90%
88%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.46

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

45°C113 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

55°C131 °F
65°C149 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

57°C135 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.013
0.015

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
205°C401 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100 · Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
1.3 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

40 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.4 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

384 kJ/m³
514 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePLLAPDLLA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLLAPLLA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLLA vs PLLA — frequently asked

Is PLLA stronger than PDLLA?

Yes. PLLA has a typical yield strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PDLLA — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLLA or PLLA?

PLLA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PDLLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PDLLA or PLLA?

PLLA. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for PDLLA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLLA and PLLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.