FabDigitFabDigit

PC-ABS vs SMA

Polymer · grade comparison

PC-ABS and SMA are both polymer grades. PC-ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for SMA, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 2.5% for SMA, and SMA is harder (85 Shore D vs 79 Shore D). SMA is lighter (1.08 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for PC-ABS) and SMA is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PC-ABS machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100), PC-ABS welds better (very good vs good), and PC-ABS sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than SMA (premium, $$$).

PC-ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

SMAChoose it when weight is the constraint.

PC-ABS vs SMA: properties

PC-ABSSMA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.87 GPa0.13 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.52 Msi
4 GPa0.54 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

56 MPa8.1 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

55 MPa8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

90%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in
16 J/m0.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

79 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

68 HRM
80 HRM

Same in both: Flexural Strength 85 MPa12.3 ksi · Shear Strength 40 MPa5.8 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell R 115 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.08 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

125°C257 °F
140°C284 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.7%

Refractive Index

—
1.57

Light Transmission

—
85%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

120°C248 °F
133°C271 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

105°C221 °F
115°C239 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

23%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

125°C257 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F · Vicat Softening Point (B50) 135°C275 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.9

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.008 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

14 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

265°C509 °F
245°C473 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

75°C167 °F
70°C158 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
46 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.1 MN·m/kg
3.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

630 kJ/m³
379 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-ABSSMA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC-ABSSMA
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PC-ABS vs SMA — frequently asked

Is PC-ABS stronger than SMA?

Yes. PC-ABS has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for SMA — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC-ABS or SMA?

PC-ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while SMA is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PC-ABS or SMA?

PC-ABS, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for SMA; for welding the order is PC-ABS first (very good, 72/100) then SMA (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC-ABS and SMA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.