FabDigitFabDigit

ASA vs SMA

Polymer · grade comparison

ASA and SMA are both polymer grades. SMA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for ASA, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi). In exchange, ASA is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 2.5% for SMA, and SMA is harder (85 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). SMA is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 2.2 GPa) and SMA runs hotter in service (100°C vs 80°C continuous). On the shop floor, ASA machines more easily (very good vs good), ASA welds better (very good vs good), and ASA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than SMA (premium, $$$).

ASAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

SMAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

ASA vs SMA: properties

ASASMA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.8 GPa0.12 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
4 GPa0.54 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

47 MPa6.8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in
16 J/m0.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

70 HRM
80 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
115 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.07 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.08 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
140°C284 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.7%

Light Transmission

—
85%

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.57

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

98°C208 °F
133°C271 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

88°C190 °F
115°C239 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
135°C275 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
0.008

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

88 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Mold Temperature (typ.)

65°C149 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 0.5% · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 245°C473 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.9 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

44 kN·m/kg
46 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.1 MN·m/kg
3.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

460 kJ/m³
379 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleASASMA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityASASMA
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ASA vs SMA — frequently asked

Is SMA stronger than ASA?

Yes. SMA has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for ASA — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ASA or SMA?

ASA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while SMA is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ASA or SMA?

ASA. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for SMA; for welding the order is ASA first (very good, 70/100) then SMA (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ASA and SMA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.