FabDigitFabDigit

PC-ABS vs PS

Polymer · grade comparison

PC-ABS and PS are both polymer grades. PC-ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for PS, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 46 MPa (6.67 ksi). PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 2.5% for PS, and PS is harder (85 Shore D vs 79 Shore D). PS is lighter (1.05 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for PC-ABS) and PS is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PC-ABS (standard, $$).

PC-ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PC-ABS vs PS: properties

PC-ABSPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.87 GPa0.13 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.52 Msi
4 GPa0.51 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

56 MPa8.1 ksi
46 MPa6.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

55 MPa8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

90%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
32 MPa4.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
1 MPa·√m0.91 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in
20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

79 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

68 HRM
75 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
120 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

125°C257 °F
100°C212 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.2%

Refractive Index

—
1.59

Light Transmission

—
90%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

120°C248 °F
85°C185 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

105°C221 °F
78°C172 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

135°C275 °F
95°C203 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

23%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

125°C257 °F
85°C185 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.008
2×10⁻⁴

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
80 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

14 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

265°C509 °F
220°C428 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

75°C167 °F
50°C122 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
87 MJ/kg37,403 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

15%
2%

Same in both: Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
44 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.1 MN·m/kg
3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

630 kJ/m³
316 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-ABSPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC-ABSPS
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PC-ABS vs PS — frequently asked

Is PC-ABS stronger than PS?

Yes. PC-ABS has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for PS — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 56 MPa (8.12 ksi) vs 46 MPa (6.67 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC-ABS or PS?

PS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PC-ABS is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PC-ABS or PS?

PC-ABS, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PS.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC-ABS and PS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.