FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs PS

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and PS are both polymer grades. PS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi). In exchange, ABS is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 2.5% for PS, and PS is harder (85 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). PS is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 2.3 GPa) and ABS runs hotter in service (75°C vs 65°C continuous). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good).

ABSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PSChoose it when strength drives the design.

ABS vs PS: properties

ABSPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
46 MPa6.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
32 MPa4.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
1 MPa·√m0.91 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
120 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.51 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.35

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
100°C212 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.2%

Refractive Index

—
1.59

Light Transmission

—
90%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
85°C185 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
78°C172 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
95°C203 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
85°C185 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
2×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
220°C428 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
50°C122 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
87 MJ/kg37,403 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
2%

Same in both: Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
44 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
316 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSPS
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs PS — frequently asked

Is PS stronger than ABS?

Yes. PS has a typical yield strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or PS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or PS?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (60/100) for PS; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then PS (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and PS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.