FabDigitFabDigit

PBT vs PCL

Polymer · grade comparison

PBT and PCL are both polymer grades. PBT is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PCL, about 4.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). In exchange, PCL is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 100% for PBT, and PBT is harder (82 Shore D vs 53 Shore D). PCL is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.31 g/cm³ for PBT) and PBT is stiffer (2.6 GPa vs 0.35 GPa). On the shop floor, PBT machines more easily (good vs poor), PCL welds better (excellent vs very good), and PBT sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PCL (premium, $$$).

PBTChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PCLChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PBT vs PCL: properties

PBTPCL

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
0.35 GPa0.05 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.93 GPa0.13 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.61 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.44

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

55 MPa8 ksi
13 MPa1.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

100%
600%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

88 MPa12.8 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
0.32 GPa0.05 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in
120 J/m2.2 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
53 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

75 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
95 Shore A

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.31 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

225°C437 °F
60°C140 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

55°C131 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.09%
0.4%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
1%

Refractive Index

—
1.47

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

110°C230 °F
40°C104 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

155°C311 °F
45°C113 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

178°C352 °F
55°C131 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

160°C320 °F
55°C131 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

25 g/10 min
7 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

250°C482 °F
110°C230 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
20°C68 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

42 kN·m/kg
19 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

582 kJ/m³
241 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePBTPCL

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBTPCL
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PBT vs PCL — frequently asked

Is PBT stronger than PCL?

Yes. PBT has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PCL — about 4.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBT or PCL?

PBT is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PCL is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PBT or PCL?

PBT. Its machinability rates good (68/100) against poor (25/100) for PCL; for welding the order is PCL first (excellent, 90/100) then PBT (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBT and PCL side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.