FabDigitFabDigit

PBAT vs PBT

Polymer · grade comparison

PBAT and PBT are both polymer grades. PBT is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for PBAT, about 5.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, PBAT is the more ductile: elongation 650% versus 100% for PBT, and PBT is harder (82 Shore D vs 32 Shore D). PBAT is lighter (1.26 g/cm³ vs 1.31 g/cm³ for PBT) and PBT is stiffer (2.6 GPa vs 0.09 GPa). On the shop floor, PBT machines more easily (good vs poor) and PBAT welds better (excellent vs very good).

PBATChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PBTChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PBAT vs PBT: properties

PBATPBT

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.09 GPa0.01 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

10 MPa1.5 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

650%
100%

Flexural Modulus

0.09 GPa0.01 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

90 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

32 Shore D
82 Shore D

Tear Strength

120 kN/m685 lbf/in
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.93 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
118 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.31 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

115°C239 °F
225°C437 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-30°C-22 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
0.09%

Light Transmission

80%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.45%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
110°C230 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

60°C140 °F
155°C311 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

80°C176 °F
178°C352 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
160°C320 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 21%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.1

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Electrical Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
23 kV/mm584 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.02

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
82 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

3.5 g/10 min
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
250°C482 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
70°C158 °F

Polishability

—
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

24 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

556 kJ/m³
582 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePBTPBAT

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBATPBT
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PBAT vs PBT — frequently asked

Is PBT stronger than PBAT?

Yes. PBT has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for PBAT — about 5.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBAT or PBT?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PBAT or PBT?

PBT. Its machinability rates good (68/100) against poor (25/100) for PBAT; for welding the order is PBAT first (excellent, 88/100) then PBT (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBAT and PBT side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.