FabDigitFabDigit

PBT vs PETG

Polymer · grade comparison

PBT and PETG are both polymer grades. PBT is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, PETG is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 100% for PBT. PETG is lighter (1.27 g/cm³ vs 1.31 g/cm³ for PBT) and PBT is stiffer (2.6 GPa vs 2.1 GPa). On the shop floor, PETG welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100) and PETG sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PBT (standard, $$).

PBTChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PETGChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PBT vs PETG: properties

PBTPETG

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.93 GPa0.13 Msi
0.77 GPa0.11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.61 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

55 MPa8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

100%
120%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

88 MPa12.8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

75 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
115 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.31 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

225°C437 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

55°C131 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.09%
0.13%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.5%

Refractive Index

—
1.57

Light Transmission

—
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

110°C230 °F
63°C145 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

155°C311 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
64°C147 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

178°C352 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

160°C320 °F
75°C167 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
2.8

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
72 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
0.35%

Melt Flow Rate

25 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

250°C482 °F
245°C473 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

42 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

582 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPBT

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBTPETG
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Both are offered for Injection molding. They share 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PBT vs PETG — frequently asked

Is PBT stronger than PETG?

Yes. PBT has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBT or PETG?

PETG is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PBT is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PBT or PETG?

PETG. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (70/100) for PBT.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBT and PETG side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.