FabDigitFabDigit

PBS vs PBT

Polymer · grade comparison

PBS and PBT are both polymer grades. PBT is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for PBS, about 72% more; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi). In exchange, PBS is the more ductile: elongation 300% versus 100% for PBT, and PBT is harder (82 Shore D vs 60 Shore D). PBS is lighter (1.26 g/cm³ vs 1.31 g/cm³ for PBT) and PBT is stiffer (2.6 GPa vs 0.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PBT machines more easily (good vs fair) and PBS welds better (excellent vs very good).

PBSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PBTChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PBS vs PBT: properties

PBSPBT

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

32 MPa4.6 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

300%
100%

Flexural Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.66 GPa0.1 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

60 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

70 HRR
118 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.93 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
75 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.31 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

115°C239 °F
225°C437 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-32°C-26 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.09%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.45%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
110°C230 °F

Min Service Temperature

-25°C-13 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

96°C205 °F
155°C311 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

66°C151 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

104°C219 °F
178°C352 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

100°C212 °F
160°C320 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 21%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Electrical Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
23 kV/mm584 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.02

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.1

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Corrosion Resistance

—
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

175°C347 °F
250°C482 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
70°C158 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.5 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

853 kJ/m³
582 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePBTPBS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBSPBT
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PBS vs PBT — frequently asked

Is PBT stronger than PBS?

Yes. PBT has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for PBS — about 72% more. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBS or PBT?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PBS or PBT?

PBT. Its machinability rates good (68/100) against fair (50/100) for PBS; for welding the order is PBS first (excellent, 85/100) then PBT (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBS and PBT side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.