FabDigitFabDigit

PBSA vs PDLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PBSA and PDLA are both polymer grades. PDLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PBSA, about 4.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). In exchange, PBSA is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 4% for PDLA, and PDLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 45 Shore D). PDLA is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 0.22 GPa) and PBSA runs hotter in service (55°C vs 50°C continuous). On the shop floor, PDLA machines more easily (good vs poor), PBSA welds better (excellent vs good), and PBSA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PDLA (high, $$$$).

PBSAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PDLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PBSA vs PDLA: properties

PBSAPDLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
4%

Flexural Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.24 GPa0.03 Msi
3.6 GPa0.52 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

600 J/m11.2 ft·lbf/in
20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

93 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

45 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

70 HRR
105 HRR

Tear Strength

90 kN/m514 lbf/in
—

Shear Modulus

—
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.57 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Strength

—
48 MPa7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.24 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

90°C194 °F
178°C352 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-43°C-45 °F
58°C136 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1%

Refractive Index

1.47
1.455

Light Transmission

85%
90%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,850 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F
1,590 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
50°C122 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

60°C140 °F
62°C144 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

68°C154 °F
59°C138 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
20%

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
53°C127 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (short-term) 70°C158 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.02

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

88 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.4%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
15 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
210°C410 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.6 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

18 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

384 kJ/m³
510 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLAPBSA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBSAPDLA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PBSA vs PDLA — frequently asked

Is PDLA stronger than PBSA?

Yes. PDLA has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PBSA — about 4.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBSA or PDLA?

PBSA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PDLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PBSA or PDLA?

PDLA. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against poor (25/100) for PBSA; for welding the order is PBSA first (excellent, 88/100) then PDLA (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBSA and PDLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.