FabDigitFabDigit

PBSA vs PHBV

Polymer · grade comparison

PBSA and PHBV are both polymer grades. PHBV is the stronger of the two: yield strength 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PBSA, about 92% more; tensile strength follows at 27 MPa (3.92 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). In exchange, PBSA is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 8% for PHBV, and PHBV is harder (75 Shore D vs 45 Shore D). PHBV is stiffer (1.8 GPa vs 0.22 GPa) and PHBV runs hotter in service (95°C vs 55°C continuous). On the shop floor, PHBV machines more easily (good vs poor), PBSA welds better (excellent vs good), and PBSA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PHBV (premium, $$$).

PBSAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PHBVChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PBSA vs PHBV: properties

PBSAPHBV

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
1.8 GPa0.26 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
27 MPa3.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
8%

Flexural Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.24 GPa0.03 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

600 J/m11.2 ft·lbf/in
40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

93 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

45 Shore D
75 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

70 HRR
95 HRR

Tear Strength

90 kN/m514 lbf/in
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.65 GPa0.09 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.24 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

90°C194 °F
155°C311 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-43°C-45 °F
2°C36 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1%

Refractive Index

1.47
1.5

Light Transmission

85%
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,850 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

60°C140 °F
110°C230 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

68°C154 °F
140°C284 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 21%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.01

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

88 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
170°C338 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
55°C131 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 1.4%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

18 kN·m/kg
22 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
1.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

384 kJ/m³
174 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePHBVPBSA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBSAPHBV
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PBSA vs PHBV — frequently asked

Is PHBV stronger than PBSA?

Yes. PHBV has a typical yield strength of 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PBSA — about 92% more. Tensile strength is 27 MPa (3.92 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBSA or PHBV?

PBSA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PHBV is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PBSA or PHBV?

PHBV. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (25/100) for PBSA; for welding the order is PBSA first (excellent, 88/100) then PHBV (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBSA and PHBV side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.