FabDigitFabDigit

PDLA vs PDLLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLA and PDLLA are both polymer grades. PDLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PDLLA, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, PDLLA is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 4% for PDLA. PDLA is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 3 GPa) and PDLA runs hotter in service (50°C vs 45°C continuous).

PDLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PDLLAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PDLA vs PDLLA: properties

PDLAPDLLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.57 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
5%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

83 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
95 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.36 · Izod Impact, Notched 20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Temperature (Tm)

178°C352 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

58°C136 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
1.2%

Refractive Index

1.455
1.46

Same in both: Density 1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³ · Light Transmission 90%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,590 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

50°C122 °F
45°C113 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

53°C127 °F
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

59°C138 °F
57°C135 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
22%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.013

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100 · Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
40 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
2.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

510 kJ/m³
384 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLAPDLLA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLAPDLLA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLA vs PDLLA — frequently asked

Is PDLA stronger than PDLLA?

Yes. PDLA has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PDLLA — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLA or PDLLA?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PDLA or PDLLA?

PDLA. Its weldability rates good (60/100) against good (55/100) for PDLLA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLA and PDLLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.