FabDigitFabDigit

PDLA vs PHB

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLA and PHB are both polymer grades. PDLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for PHB, about 66% more; tensile strength follows at 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 36 MPa (5.22 ksi). In exchange, PHB is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 4% for PDLA, and PDLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). PHB is stiffer (3.5 GPa vs 3.3 GPa) and PHB runs hotter in service (100°C vs 50°C continuous). On the shop floor, PDLA welds better (good vs fair) and PHB sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PDLA (high, $$$$).

PDLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

PHBChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PDLA vs PHB: properties

PDLAPHB

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.57 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
36 MPa5.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
5%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

83 Shore D
78 Shore D

Same in both: Hardness, Rockwell R 105 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Temperature (Tm)

178°C352 °F
175°C347 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

58°C136 °F
4°C39 °F

Refractive Index

1.455
1.46

Light Transmission

90%
—

Same in both: Density 1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³ · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,590 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

50°C122 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

53°C127 °F
105°C221 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

59°C138 °F
155°C311 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
—

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.5%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
175°C347 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
29 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

510 kJ/m³
175 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLAPHB

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLAPHB
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLA vs PHB — frequently asked

Is PDLA stronger than PHB?

Yes. PDLA has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for PHB — about 66% more. Tensile strength is 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 36 MPa (5.22 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLA or PHB?

PHB is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PDLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PDLA or PHB?

PDLA, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for PHB; for welding the order is PDLA first (good, 60/100) then PHB (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLA and PHB side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.