FabDigitFabDigit

PBS vs PETG

Polymer · grade comparison

PBS and PETG are both polymer grades. PETG is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for PBS, about 56% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi). In exchange, PBS is the more ductile: elongation 300% versus 120% for PETG, and PETG is harder (78 Shore D vs 60 Shore D). PETG is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 0.6 GPa) and PBS runs hotter in service (75°C vs 63°C continuous). On the shop floor, PETG machines more easily (good vs fair) and PETG sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PBS (standard, $$).

PBSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PETGChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PBS vs PETG: properties

PBSPETG

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

32 MPa4.6 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

300%
120%

Flexural Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.66 GPa0.1 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

60 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

70 HRR
115 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.77 GPa0.11 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

115°C239 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-32°C-26 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.13%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.5%

Refractive Index

—
1.57

Light Transmission

—
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
63°C145 °F

Min Service Temperature

-25°C-13 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

96°C205 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

66°C151 °F
64°C147 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

104°C219 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

100°C212 °F
75°C167 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
2.8

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Electrical Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.02

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
45 / 100

Corrosion Resistance

—
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
72 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
0.35%

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

175°C347 °F
245°C473 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.5 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

853 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPBS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBSPETG
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

PBS vs PETG — frequently asked

Is PETG stronger than PBS?

Yes. PETG has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for PBS — about 56% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBS or PETG?

PETG is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PBS is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PBS or PETG?

PETG. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against fair (50/100) for PBS; for welding the order is PBS first (excellent, 85/100) then PETG (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBS and PETG side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.