FabDigitFabDigit

PBS vs PET

Polymer · grade comparison

PBS and PET are both polymer grades. PET is the stronger of the two: yield strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for PBS, about 150% more; tensile strength follows at 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi). In exchange, PBS is the more ductile: elongation 300% versus 20% for PET, and PET is harder (85 Shore D vs 60 Shore D). PBS is lighter (1.26 g/cm³ vs 1.39 g/cm³ for PET) and PET is stiffer (3.1 GPa vs 0.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PET machines more easily (very good vs fair) and PBS welds better (excellent vs fair).

PBSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PETChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PBS vs PET: properties

PBSPET

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
82 MPa11.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

32 MPa4.6 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

300%
20%

Flexural Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.66 GPa0.1 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in
40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

60 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

70 HRR
120 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Strength

—
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
94 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.26 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.39 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

115°C239 °F
255°C491 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-32°C-26 °F
79°C174 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.11%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.5%

Refractive Index

—
1.575

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-25°C-13 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

96°C205 °F
115°C239 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

66°C151 °F
80°C176 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

104°C219 °F
180°C356 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
22%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

100°C212 °F
150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
3.2

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Electrical Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.018

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

—
70 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
78 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

175°C347 °F
280°C536 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
135°C275 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.8 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
25%

Embodied Water

—
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.5 MN·m/kg
2.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

853 kJ/m³
1,032 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETPBS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBSPET
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PBS vs PET — frequently asked

Is PET stronger than PBS?

Yes. PET has a typical yield strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for PBS — about 150% more. Tensile strength is 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 34 MPa (4.93 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PBS or PET?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PBS or PET?

PET. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against fair (50/100) for PBS; for welding the order is PBS first (excellent, 85/100) then PET (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBS and PET side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.